Head-footing in Rajasthan Congress, Divya Maderna showed mirror to Shanti Dhariwal in harsh words

What did Divya Maderna say?

Congress MLA Divya Maderna wrote on her Twitter page of social media that ‘I strongly condemn the statement of Shanti Dhariwal. In public life, our parties, political ideologies are different, there can be differences of opinion and difference of opinion, but giving such a title to a public representative like a terrorist has set a very low example for those who believe in democracy. Divya further wrote that ‘Chief Minister’s not giving a job outside the martyr’s family is a right step, but is it right to give the title of terrorist to Kirorilal ji on behalf of Shanti Dhariwal to hide the indecent behavior done by the police? Is.’
Kirori Baba did not express faith in Gehlot government’s hospital, gave this reason for leaving SMS hospital

Know what Shanti Dhariwal said in the House

On Monday, March 13, the issue of the martyrs of the Pulwama terror attack was being discussed. During this, the members of the opposition termed the misbehavior with the heroines and the treatment meted out to the Rajya Sabha MP by the police as brutal. Shanti Dhariwal was replying to the allegations made by the members of the opposition. During this, Dhariwal had said that ‘every person who is interested in politics knows that the kind of act done by Dr. Kirorilal Meena ji is no less than a terrorist’. On this, the members of the opposition created a huge ruckus in the house. Regarding this statement of Dhariwal, Congress MLA Divya Maderna tweeted expressing strong objection.

Heavy ruckus in Rajasthan Vidhansabha on the issue of Pulwama heroines, Dhariwal called MP Kirorilal Meena a terrorist

Divya also opposed this

Two days ago, during the discussion in the House on the issue of heroines, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Shanti Dhariwal gave another controversial statement. Dhariwal had said that the brother-in-law of Martyr Rohitash Lamba’s wife was already married. He also has two children. Then she went to his relation. Now relatives go and say that give a compassionate job to my brother-in-law. What a strange sight.’ This statement of Dhariwal was strongly opposed by the members of the opposition. Congress MLA Divya Maderna also tweeted on this statement of Dhariwal and wrote that whether or not there is proof of whether the heroine Manju went to Nate or not. The ideological question is also that who created the practice of going to someone’s kin when a woman becomes a widow. If this practice is wrong then why is it acceptable to the society. Divya asked why fingers are being pointed at someone’s character because of this practice.
Report: Ramswaroop Lamrod