Bhaskar News Service
Muzaffarnagar. The news of the board meeting held on 29 January was published in all the media in which two councilors took my name and said that my going to the municipal school on 26 January, Republic Day, has insulted the board, it is very unfortunate that they have to follow the rules. Having no knowledge of the law and the Constitution, I was insulted in this dignified House, whereas these people should know that the Municipal School and the Municipality are public property, not anyone's personal property and on a constitutional occasion, no ordinary person can A citizen can participate in a patriotic program anywhere. Apart from this, after reading the news of the Lokayukta episode, I was surprised that the news was published without taking my version, whereas at least my version should have been taken! In the Lokayukta complaint case, the complaint made by the blackmailer complainant has been made from the year 2012 to March 2018, whereas I had taken oath as the Municipality President on 12 December 2017 and had assumed the duty of Municipality President. Thus, there is a complaint of only 3 months of my tenure, the point raised in the complaint is related to the construction of shops in the land of Sarvat Shiv Mandir Khatton. In this, lease was given by the then board for 30 years from the year 1966 to 1996. But it was given. I was not the president at that time. In the report sent by the Additional District Officer Administration through the District Magistrate to the government, it is clearly mentioned that when the shops were being constructed, the municipality should have stopped the construction work. And since the matter is of Shiv Temple, it is not appropriate to even touch it now. In such a situation, when I was not the president, the complaint of me illegally occupying the municipal land is meaningless and baseless. Whereas I During his tenure, without any police force, a marriage hall has been constructed by removing illegal encroachment from the municipal cremation ground Janakpuri and Roorkee Road. Apart from this, the park land in Mohalla Sarwat itself was freed from encroachment and near the police station in Nai Mandi. The land has also been freed from encroachment. As far as the complaint of less collection of land tax and water tax is concerned, it is completely baseless because tax was imposed on residential and commercial buildings through self-assessment, and 100% recovery was done. For the convenience of the public. Keeping this in mind, the facility to deposit house tax and water tax online was also provided. Thus the complaint is baseless. Apart from this, a complaint has been made against Shri Gopichand Clerk that the amount has been reduced by him in the water price bills whereas no such complaint, written or oral, has come during my tenure of 3 months mentioned above nor Any such mention of any building has been made by the complainant whereas in the Water Department, the Water Works Engineer, Accountant and Executive Officer are investigating it. In the Lokayukta case, it has been shown that three birth certificates have been made on the basis of affidavits of a person, these too do not come within the period of three and a half months, there is a clear order by the Registrar, New Delhi that the work of birth and death is done by the Registrar in the urban body. Will be edited and its complete process is that the birth or death certificate which is prepared on the basis of affidavit, first the applicant presents the affidavit in front of the competent authority, the city magistrate, then after the registrar checks it, the city magistrate approves it. The Chairman issues no role in this. In such a situation, this point of complaint itself is baseless. Another pointless point was raised by the complainant in which it is mentioned that Mr. Praveen Kumar Clerk has been appointed illegally while his The appointment was made in the year 1989 as per the order of the government, if Praveen Kumar was not appointed by me, then the basis of the complaint itself is wrong. None of the allegations are proved, this can be confirmed by any citizen from the records in the municipality. l I have sent a reply with factual and evidence to Lokayukta Uttar Pradesh and Chief Secretary Urban Development, on which a request has been made to reconsider and provide an opportunity for hearing. Till now no reply has been received, on receiving the reply, it will be considered as per the legal procedure. Action will be taken. When I took charge of the municipality, the municipality was in debt of about Rs. 16 crores and when I completed my tenure, after eliminating the loan amount and doing development work, the debt amount was more than Rs. 90 crores. I have left the municipality in profit due to which the development of the city is going on, in such a situation, things like morality are nothing but blackmailing of the complainant. I have made the municipality run efficiently by following the principle of more income and less expenditure. I am against those who insult me. After consulting my legal advisor regarding these blackmailers, I am also considering taking legal action against them under relevant sections of defamation.
: Language Inputs
This post is sourced from newspapers, magazines and third-party websites. For more information please check NewsDay Express Disclaimer.